If there’s something abundant in digital marketing, it’s metrics and KPIs. Every campaign, platform, and channel generates a constant flow of data: clicks, impressions, reach, open rates, conversions, and more. However, measuring more doesn’t mean measuring better. The report The Effectiveness Equation, developed by Google, warns about the KPI trap: a situation where brands get stuck optimizing indicators that have no clear connection to actual business growth.
According to Google’s report, many organizations set up their campaigns around ten or more different KPIs, which leads to scattered goals, team confusion, and an inefficient use of the budget. Far from helping, this data overload hinders strategic decision-making and weakens marketing effectiveness.
ALSO READ. CFO vs. CMO: The disagreement that can kill your marketing budget
KPI Trap: What are the consequences of measuring for the sake of measuring?
The report outlines that when a company tries to optimize many indicators at once, it often falls into three common errors:
- Budget dilution: Resources are fragmented across multiple campaigns to satisfy each KPI, without achieving depth in any.
- Analytics fatigue: Marketing and analytics teams feel overwhelmed by complex dashboards that make it difficult to distinguish the essential from the trivial.
- Algorithmic confusion: Programmatic buying platforms (like Google Ads) need clear signals to optimize. Too many KPIs can confuse algorithms, generating inconsistent results.
As the study sums up, “more metrics don’t mean more control”. In many cases, teams end up working to feed reports… instead of making actionable decisions that drive the business.
READ ALSO. The marketing effectiveness equation according to Google
Why can a single KPI distort reality?
While too many metrics is problematic, oversimplifying is just as dangerous. Google’s report compares this to using flat maps to represent the Earth: it’s a useful tool, but it introduces inevitable distortions.
Likewise, a single KPI —such as CTR (click-through rate) or CPA (cost per acquisition)— can offer a limited or even misleading view of a campaign’s performance. For instance, an ad with a high CTR may not actually drive valuable conversions, and a campaign with low CPA may be attracting unprofitable users.
The solution is not to measure too much or too little, but to intelligently choose the indicators that truly matter for each stage of the conversion funnel and business objective.
READ ALSO. Top 10 Marketing Skills for 2025 (According to Global CMOs)
How to define KPIs that truly impact your strategy?
Google’s report recommends setting a small, carefully selected set of KPIs based on three criteria:
- Strategic relevance: Is the indicator directly tied to a business objective? Does it contribute to growth, profitability, or positioning?
- Actionability: Does the data allow for concrete decisions? Can the campaign be adjusted based on that metric?
- Shared understanding: Do all departments (marketing, finance, leadership) interpret the KPI the same way?
A suggested best practice is to classify KPIs into three levels:
- Tactical efficiency indicators: such as CPA, CTR, conversion rate.
- Brand health indicators: such as awareness, preference, or equity.
- Business indicators: such as CLTV (customer lifetime value), market share, or marginal ROI.
READ ALSO. B2B Content Marketing: Key Metrics in 2025
What metrics does Google recommend to avoid the KPI trap?
Within The Effectiveness Equation, Google highlights four key metrics to escape the trap:
- Total ROI (TROI): Measures the return generated from the entire advertising investment.
- Marginal ROI (MROI): Assesses how much value each additional unit of budget adds.
- Incrementality: Determines whether sales were directly driven by marketing, not external factors.
- CLTV (Customer Lifetime Value): Projects how much value a customer will generate over time.
These metrics help integrate performance campaigns with the long-term effects of branding and connect the world of the CMO with that of the CFO.
READ ALSO. The marketing economy: an industry that already surpasses the GDP of countries like Australia
CFOs vs. CMOs, the battle for KPI selection
One of the main challenges identified in the report is the disconnect between marketing and finance teams. While CMOs work with brand and engagement metrics, CFOs demand harder financial indicators.
This mismatch can lead to rejected budgets, unjustified cuts, or decisions based on perceptions rather than data.
To avoid this, Google recommends creating a shared measurement culture, where KPIs are not imposed by one department but are built collaboratively, aligning goals and language.
How to avoid falling into the KPI trap? 4 practical tips
The report concludes with several actionable recommendations to help marketing teams break free from this trap:
- Less is more: Limit your KPIs to a manageable and relevant number.
- Prioritize impact over ease: Don’t use metrics just because they’re easy to obtain; ensure they directly relate to the business.
- Align KPIs with the customer journey: Not all indicators work for all stages.
- Review your metrics regularly: What worked a year ago might no longer make sense today.
READ ALSO. Which social network is best for small accounts? The best algorithms for growing without paying
👉 Follow us on Google News.
👉 Follow us on Google News.
